I truly love this country but, do admit to having a fetish regarding liars. I can't stand them - but, may need to clarify my position here.
All of us have lied at one time or another. I had one friend back in the 60's who, when I questioned her about something she had told me, claimed, "That's not lying - that's mental reservation." Here's somebody who paid attention in catechism classes.
I liked that. The issue was not all that important and it suggested a certain amount of ingenuity on her part.
Unfortunately, the practice - 50 years later- of spinning, failing to reveal important facts (mental reservation?) or, of juggling the words to mislead someone, has become a strong candidate for Horse of the Year in a race against the favorite, "Outright Lying".
Where is the Fels Naptha laundry soap when you really need it?
In a past blog I related a story about another woman who's precocious son was persistent in demanding to know something. After observing several Santa Clauses while shopping with Mom in downtown Pittsburgh he insisted, "There really is no Santa Claus, right Mom?"
After much deliberation she said, "You're right honey. There is no Santa Claus."
The son was "destroyed" and continued to cry until Mom recanted, saying,"Please don't cry. Mommy lied."
I'll never forget that story and it's impact. I was the son and cried all the way back to my college classes at Grove City - uncertain which of Mom's statements was the real lie.
OK, I "lied" about the last part in a feeble attempt to inject some humor into the story - and, that's part of the problem in today's society: "When is a lie - a lie?"
It's getting harder and harder to determine what a lie is; and whether the person relating something is as Gabby Hayes often said, " a goshdarn polecat liar- dagnabbit!"
To make it even more difficult in these litigious times, we now anxiously await the Supreme Court to eventually inform us whether or not the telling of a lie is protected by the First Amendment- Freedom of Speech.
Now to all of you men who have instructed your kids to tell a telephone caller you're not home, or even extending the possible consequences to females in the bedroom - this could get pretty scary.
Fortunately, the subject of the litigation is not "convenient" lies. It is whether or not someone wrongfully claiming military service to get a job and later presenting the requisite supporting medals, is protected by the Constitution as simply exercising his or her free speech.
Now, my own emphasis here is for me to keep from lying by suggesting that the subject of this blog and my treatment of same is an example of original journalism.
I have to admit to having read an excellent discussion of the subject this morning in a Washington Post column by Robert Barnes ("The High Court: Is lying protected speech? Military-medal case on track for Supreme Court?")- (Sunday March 27, 2011)
The subject is intriguing. Is lying unconstitutional? The Valor Act was passed by Congress in 2005 to address the apparent increase in folks falsely insisting they were distinguished members of the Armed Forces - with the use of someone elses medals to apparently advance their claims.
The Act allows for a fine and/or a six month prison term. Apparently the impact of the Act has not scared people off. Perhaps it's the appeal of 3 square meals a day in a cushy prison during a tough economy.
This blogger has seen no sign that we are experiencing a rapid ascent along a continuom toward the resumption of telling the truth. However, there is no denying the subject matter has gained considerable interest in certain quarters.
Barry Bonds current trial regarding lying to a Grand Jury about his use of steroids while under oath, is in all the papers. Roger Clemons trial regarding lying to Congress is on the horizon.
If one can get past the titillating testimoney of Bond's 9 year mistress during the period of his two marriages as to how taking steroids changed the size of "his junk" as well as his sexual performance - we may eventually find out if he lied - or not.
Apparently this alleged lie is important based on the news the government invested $6 million in their attempts to prosecute him for doing so. Bonds appears to have more attorneys involved than the government so one assumes he has some interest in the subject as well.
Lying to the government appears to carry more "No-No" than simply lying about a non-existant service record and buying medals in a pawn shop.
It definitely surpasses in importance of either mental reservation or tall tales about the existance of St. Nick.
Stay tuned for the Supremes to make a decision. In the meantime, let's find out if Sir Barry's pants are on fire or not.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Monday, March 28, 2011
LIFE'S QUIRKS - HOLLYWOOD IN POLITICS?
We recently enjoyed a political cartoon by Tom Toles in the Washington Post. It showed the GOP elephant in his polka dot boxers.
The robust tusked one is pictured attempting to pick one outfit containing dozens and dozens of suits from an open closet that is marked "2012 Candidates".
The balloon over the elephant reads: "But, not one of them fits."
If you're a registered Republican - like myself - you've got to be asking, "Why not?" Why is it so seemingly difficult for a political party that had an elected President in charge for 8 years, appear now, over two years later - to not be able to find a viable candidate?
Why this apparent lack of locomotion four full months since the successful midterms after which their Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell declared, "Our primary goal now is to see to it Obama doesn't serve a second term."
Would you agree with me that's a little like putting the cart before the horse? It would seem finding a viable platform and a candidate might be an even better start to their campaigning.
Is it possible that the GOP brass is still seeking someone with the credentials of attractive seniors like Al Dole or John McClain - their two most recent failures wrapped around "two term George"?
The GOP braintrust seems to find it difficult to forego old ideas. As a result they have po'd most of the union members in this country. So, let's forget that crossover vote.
Their success with appealing to the rest of the country by controlling illegal immigration is laughable due largely to the successful lobbying efforts of the US Chamber of Commerce, a Republican stalward.
People once compared the Republican party to the "old" CBS network that seemed hellbent on selecting only programming that would appeal to older Americans.
Since that time CBS demographics suggest they are the most creative network in coming up with successful new shows that appeal to a multi-generational audience.
Recent TV hits include CBS's "The Good Wife"- "Hawaii 50"- "The Defenders","The Blue Bloods","NCIS LA" & "The Defenders" to go along with with old favorites "NCIS", and their "CSI's" operating out of every location with the possible exception of Wilmerding, Pa.
Perhaps,it's now time for the Republican Party to start picking their presidential candidate from CBS's lineup. May I be the first to suggest LL Cool J from "NCIS LA", Tom Selleck from "Blue Bloods", or Mark Harmon from "NCIS"?
OK;I know. LL's clearly out of the question for the Grand "Old" Party. He's a person of color. They had a Secretary of State with that distinction who lost favor becaue he had the gall to disagree with short white politicians.
But, let's give some thought to Selleck. We know he's never served as the Governor of California and, being the fictional NYC Police Commissioner won't cut it either. However, like Reagan, he's good looking - eloquent - tall - funny etc. Besides,in his new hit show,he appears to dye his hair also.
If not that route, how about an ex-quarterback turned actor from a quaint university out in California and who still wows the women - "NCIS" star Mark Harmon?
If you could pull him away from his image of building a boat in his basement while disdaining power tools - and getting shot up occasionally - he seems like a natural choice to make the transfer from NCIS in Washington, DC over to The White House.
The GOP should choose one of them as their candidate. They're tried and true actors who memorize their lines every week.. That's certainly preferable to having to remind Sarah and Newt that what they just said is the complete opposite of what they were quoted as telling CBS's Face The Nation, 10 days ago
Both actors seem to appeal to the ladies and some of them still vote. There is no doubt in this blogger's mind they could not possibly have made more ridiculous Presidential candidate choices than the men in power at the GOP.
Women vote for women too. So, the GOP might also want to consider starting a groudswell movement for Michele Bachman the beautiful House Representatve from Minnesota. Remember: selecting a person who didn't know what they were talking about got them a guy who enabled the party to tread water for two "fool" terms.
Good looks sell - ask CBS.
If asked to talk to the GOP brass (right before pigs fly) I would say, "Once you get your most recently elected GOP party chairman to go the way of his misguided predecessors, it still might not be too late to choose CBS CEO Les Moonves,as your next Republican Party Chairman.
He picked those successful TV shows, turned the old network around and has a lot of time on his hands now that he doesn't have to deal with Charlie Sheen until the unlikely trial date.
Don't give up on LL Cool J, either.
Keep in mind: That "LL" still stands for: "Ladies Like Cool J."
The robust tusked one is pictured attempting to pick one outfit containing dozens and dozens of suits from an open closet that is marked "2012 Candidates".
The balloon over the elephant reads: "But, not one of them fits."
If you're a registered Republican - like myself - you've got to be asking, "Why not?" Why is it so seemingly difficult for a political party that had an elected President in charge for 8 years, appear now, over two years later - to not be able to find a viable candidate?
Why this apparent lack of locomotion four full months since the successful midterms after which their Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell declared, "Our primary goal now is to see to it Obama doesn't serve a second term."
Would you agree with me that's a little like putting the cart before the horse? It would seem finding a viable platform and a candidate might be an even better start to their campaigning.
Is it possible that the GOP brass is still seeking someone with the credentials of attractive seniors like Al Dole or John McClain - their two most recent failures wrapped around "two term George"?
The GOP braintrust seems to find it difficult to forego old ideas. As a result they have po'd most of the union members in this country. So, let's forget that crossover vote.
Their success with appealing to the rest of the country by controlling illegal immigration is laughable due largely to the successful lobbying efforts of the US Chamber of Commerce, a Republican stalward.
People once compared the Republican party to the "old" CBS network that seemed hellbent on selecting only programming that would appeal to older Americans.
Since that time CBS demographics suggest they are the most creative network in coming up with successful new shows that appeal to a multi-generational audience.
Recent TV hits include CBS's "The Good Wife"- "Hawaii 50"- "The Defenders","The Blue Bloods","NCIS LA" & "The Defenders" to go along with with old favorites "NCIS", and their "CSI's" operating out of every location with the possible exception of Wilmerding, Pa.
Perhaps,it's now time for the Republican Party to start picking their presidential candidate from CBS's lineup. May I be the first to suggest LL Cool J from "NCIS LA", Tom Selleck from "Blue Bloods", or Mark Harmon from "NCIS"?
OK;I know. LL's clearly out of the question for the Grand "Old" Party. He's a person of color. They had a Secretary of State with that distinction who lost favor becaue he had the gall to disagree with short white politicians.
But, let's give some thought to Selleck. We know he's never served as the Governor of California and, being the fictional NYC Police Commissioner won't cut it either. However, like Reagan, he's good looking - eloquent - tall - funny etc. Besides,in his new hit show,he appears to dye his hair also.
If not that route, how about an ex-quarterback turned actor from a quaint university out in California and who still wows the women - "NCIS" star Mark Harmon?
If you could pull him away from his image of building a boat in his basement while disdaining power tools - and getting shot up occasionally - he seems like a natural choice to make the transfer from NCIS in Washington, DC over to The White House.
The GOP should choose one of them as their candidate. They're tried and true actors who memorize their lines every week.. That's certainly preferable to having to remind Sarah and Newt that what they just said is the complete opposite of what they were quoted as telling CBS's Face The Nation, 10 days ago
Both actors seem to appeal to the ladies and some of them still vote. There is no doubt in this blogger's mind they could not possibly have made more ridiculous Presidential candidate choices than the men in power at the GOP.
Women vote for women too. So, the GOP might also want to consider starting a groudswell movement for Michele Bachman the beautiful House Representatve from Minnesota. Remember: selecting a person who didn't know what they were talking about got them a guy who enabled the party to tread water for two "fool" terms.
Good looks sell - ask CBS.
If asked to talk to the GOP brass (right before pigs fly) I would say, "Once you get your most recently elected GOP party chairman to go the way of his misguided predecessors, it still might not be too late to choose CBS CEO Les Moonves,as your next Republican Party Chairman.
He picked those successful TV shows, turned the old network around and has a lot of time on his hands now that he doesn't have to deal with Charlie Sheen until the unlikely trial date.
Don't give up on LL Cool J, either.
Keep in mind: That "LL" still stands for: "Ladies Like Cool J."
Friday, March 25, 2011
THE IRONY OF GETTING IT WRITE!
Al Neuharth, founder of USA Today and regular Friday columnist, finally got one right.
He speaks of the miracle of being brief - both in speech and in writing. Both are talents I lack. Most people would agree with both Al and myself.
One respondent to Al's (advance) column argued for the nuances and subtlety that brevity might preclude. She's my hero - and not just because she teaches linguistics at Georgetown U.
Saving money is tough. Saving words may be even more of a challenge
It's sad, but true, that, quite often when one attempts to set the stage for the story he/she is about to relate - you've lost interest due to the excess verbiage of the set up. How they were feeling that day adds little to the content.
Then again, if you're like Tina, a friend of ours with a precious southern accent - the setup often has you howling in laughter before she makes her point. Unfortunately, that's a gift that few possess.
My favorite brevity heroes are the political cartoonists. They make their point with a couple "balloons" that have an arrow pointing to the caricature speaker.
Here are a few of my favorites:
Two panels - each containing a 24 hour news broadcaster. The first ballon reads "The Libyan tyrant has turned his guns on his people. HOW CAN OBAMA FAIL TO STEP IN?"
The second panel contains this dialogue from the same newscaster." There is no exit strategy for the intervention in Libya. HOW WILL OBAMA GET OUT?"
A second political cartoon shows a wife asking her husband, "Do you have any idea what this hidden charge is on our Verizon Wireless bill?".
The husband replies, "It's for the AT&T- Mobile merger."
A third political cartoon contains two frames with - a couple sitting on a couch facing a big screen TV with the word JAPAN in large letters.. In the first frame the husband states, "Don't worry . . it could never happen here"
The wife asks, "What couldn't?"
The husband responds, "A major disaster with absolutely no looting."
The final cartoon shows 6 people standing in groups of two - all in one frame. One couple is marked "JAPAN" and the balloon says, "we're fighting for survival". The second couple is identified as Libyan rebels. Their balloon states, "we're fighting for freedom."
The third couple is marked NFL. They are dressed in business suits and carrying briefcases. Their balloon says, "And we're fighting for ... Well.... frankly, I'm embarassed to say."
It is amazing what ironic messages you can convey using no more than 10 balloons.
He speaks of the miracle of being brief - both in speech and in writing. Both are talents I lack. Most people would agree with both Al and myself.
One respondent to Al's (advance) column argued for the nuances and subtlety that brevity might preclude. She's my hero - and not just because she teaches linguistics at Georgetown U.
Saving money is tough. Saving words may be even more of a challenge
It's sad, but true, that, quite often when one attempts to set the stage for the story he/she is about to relate - you've lost interest due to the excess verbiage of the set up. How they were feeling that day adds little to the content.
Then again, if you're like Tina, a friend of ours with a precious southern accent - the setup often has you howling in laughter before she makes her point. Unfortunately, that's a gift that few possess.
My favorite brevity heroes are the political cartoonists. They make their point with a couple "balloons" that have an arrow pointing to the caricature speaker.
Here are a few of my favorites:
Two panels - each containing a 24 hour news broadcaster. The first ballon reads "The Libyan tyrant has turned his guns on his people. HOW CAN OBAMA FAIL TO STEP IN?"
The second panel contains this dialogue from the same newscaster." There is no exit strategy for the intervention in Libya. HOW WILL OBAMA GET OUT?"
A second political cartoon shows a wife asking her husband, "Do you have any idea what this hidden charge is on our Verizon Wireless bill?".
The husband replies, "It's for the AT&T- Mobile merger."
A third political cartoon contains two frames with - a couple sitting on a couch facing a big screen TV with the word JAPAN in large letters.. In the first frame the husband states, "Don't worry . . it could never happen here"
The wife asks, "What couldn't?"
The husband responds, "A major disaster with absolutely no looting."
The final cartoon shows 6 people standing in groups of two - all in one frame. One couple is marked "JAPAN" and the balloon says, "we're fighting for survival". The second couple is identified as Libyan rebels. Their balloon states, "we're fighting for freedom."
The third couple is marked NFL. They are dressed in business suits and carrying briefcases. Their balloon says, "And we're fighting for ... Well.... frankly, I'm embarassed to say."
It is amazing what ironic messages you can convey using no more than 10 balloons.
Friday, March 11, 2011
CHUTZPAH
Love reading the papers.
The NFL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION (NFLPA) has been asking the NFL OWNERS forever if they could obtain details of the finances of the NFL clubs.
They were seeking some verification that the owners claim of "poorhouse proximity" was accurate.
You see, there is a tendency to do that when someone asks you to give them a billion dollars out of your pocket.
The NFL and the owners have repeatedly said "NO!" to the revealing of finances.
I agree that there are certain proprietary rights due anyone in business and talking about your finances could cause problems down the road - not just with the IRS - but a pending divorce lawyer, as well.
But, there are also reasonable expectations that certain financial revelations or disclosures are necessitated and should be forthcoming when you are asking for $4 billion over 5 years.
Well, negotiations being what they are - as described by various "anonymous" sources - apparently there has been some movement, and not just on the owners inital demand for an extra $ Billion off the top.
There has also been some movement on releasing "financial" information by the league. The NFL did just that, or so the "anonymous source system" (ASS) has revealed.
The union responded, "The information that was offered wasn't what we were asking for."
DeMaurice Smith, executive director of the union, further stated:
"According to our investment bankers and advisers, that information would be totally meaningless in making a determination about whether to write an $800 million check to the NFL in the first year (of a new agreement), $800 million in the second year, $800 million in the third year, $800 in the fourth year, and $800 in the fifth year."
Here comes the chutzpah.
The NFL, in the person of Jeff Pash, NFL executive vice-president (apparently they have more than one), said before Wednesday's session that financial disclosure should not be an issue.
We agree - but, wait!
To clarify, he's quoted as saying, "If that's something that important to the union, we've made it clear we're willing to work with them on it."
He adds, "I'm hoping we can get past that if it remains a serious problem."
When do you think that would be, Jeff? I mean , seeing as how they've been requesting that information for over two years and you and your cohorts keep stiff arming them?
There is a good reason why arbitrator/negotiator Cohen has insisted that both sides remain quiet as to the progress of negotiations - and- NFL Commissioner Goodell so quickly agreed.
Maybe more than one reason
The first legitimate reason that comes to mind is based on an analogy to Obama's reluctance to see his Vice-President Joe Biden, being quoted in the media.
In the latter case it's the President shuddering in the Oval Office when one of his assistants approaches with the question, "Guess what Joe said today?"
Most often this occurs after "Joltin Joe" was asked about a recent foreign affairs matter - the reality of which unfortunately appeared to be "foreign" to him. (Won't somebody please tell poor Joe what's going on?)
The same can be said for Goodells NFL spokesman and his other "video rangers." (Sorry, Captain.)
None of this is to suggest that the NFL office team members are not extremely intelligent people for the most part. Sir Pash would be right up there at the head of the list.
It is more due to the fact that - whatever favorable relating to the common man or woman they might have done in a previous life - that talent has apparently abandoned them when they acquired their current position.
Perhaps it is not dissimilar to the stories we hear and read about various rock heros, movie & TV stars, Pro-athletes, or Silicon Valley wunderkins - who just got too caught up in themself.
Their success came too fast for them to realize that with that success comes an obligation to not assume the rest of the world got stupid. There was no white smoke involved with their selection. They are only self appointed saviors.
To be fair though, none of the NFL execs has claimed to be a warlock.
Whatever! It's just that it is grating to this blogger that the words coming from the NFL office folks appear to be extremely elitist. Sounds like a portion of those billions the league craves might be better spent by Goodell in hiring publicists for his folks - or putting a bite in their collective mouths.
"We only want what is good for our fans" isn't cutting it anymore.
By listening and reading what they, as representatives of the NFL, are allegedy saying, according to the ASS, it appears they are not only demeaning DeMaurice Smith and his team, but, their NFL fan base as well.
And, that's a !@#$%^ shame - whether it's prime time "chutzpa" - or not.
The NFL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION (NFLPA) has been asking the NFL OWNERS forever if they could obtain details of the finances of the NFL clubs.
They were seeking some verification that the owners claim of "poorhouse proximity" was accurate.
You see, there is a tendency to do that when someone asks you to give them a billion dollars out of your pocket.
The NFL and the owners have repeatedly said "NO!" to the revealing of finances.
I agree that there are certain proprietary rights due anyone in business and talking about your finances could cause problems down the road - not just with the IRS - but a pending divorce lawyer, as well.
But, there are also reasonable expectations that certain financial revelations or disclosures are necessitated and should be forthcoming when you are asking for $4 billion over 5 years.
Well, negotiations being what they are - as described by various "anonymous" sources - apparently there has been some movement, and not just on the owners inital demand for an extra $ Billion off the top.
There has also been some movement on releasing "financial" information by the league. The NFL did just that, or so the "anonymous source system" (ASS) has revealed.
The union responded, "The information that was offered wasn't what we were asking for."
DeMaurice Smith, executive director of the union, further stated:
"According to our investment bankers and advisers, that information would be totally meaningless in making a determination about whether to write an $800 million check to the NFL in the first year (of a new agreement), $800 million in the second year, $800 million in the third year, $800 in the fourth year, and $800 in the fifth year."
Here comes the chutzpah.
The NFL, in the person of Jeff Pash, NFL executive vice-president (apparently they have more than one), said before Wednesday's session that financial disclosure should not be an issue.
We agree - but, wait!
To clarify, he's quoted as saying, "If that's something that important to the union, we've made it clear we're willing to work with them on it."
He adds, "I'm hoping we can get past that if it remains a serious problem."
When do you think that would be, Jeff? I mean , seeing as how they've been requesting that information for over two years and you and your cohorts keep stiff arming them?
There is a good reason why arbitrator/negotiator Cohen has insisted that both sides remain quiet as to the progress of negotiations - and- NFL Commissioner Goodell so quickly agreed.
Maybe more than one reason
The first legitimate reason that comes to mind is based on an analogy to Obama's reluctance to see his Vice-President Joe Biden, being quoted in the media.
In the latter case it's the President shuddering in the Oval Office when one of his assistants approaches with the question, "Guess what Joe said today?"
Most often this occurs after "Joltin Joe" was asked about a recent foreign affairs matter - the reality of which unfortunately appeared to be "foreign" to him. (Won't somebody please tell poor Joe what's going on?)
The same can be said for Goodells NFL spokesman and his other "video rangers." (Sorry, Captain.)
None of this is to suggest that the NFL office team members are not extremely intelligent people for the most part. Sir Pash would be right up there at the head of the list.
It is more due to the fact that - whatever favorable relating to the common man or woman they might have done in a previous life - that talent has apparently abandoned them when they acquired their current position.
Perhaps it is not dissimilar to the stories we hear and read about various rock heros, movie & TV stars, Pro-athletes, or Silicon Valley wunderkins - who just got too caught up in themself.
Their success came too fast for them to realize that with that success comes an obligation to not assume the rest of the world got stupid. There was no white smoke involved with their selection. They are only self appointed saviors.
To be fair though, none of the NFL execs has claimed to be a warlock.
Whatever! It's just that it is grating to this blogger that the words coming from the NFL office folks appear to be extremely elitist. Sounds like a portion of those billions the league craves might be better spent by Goodell in hiring publicists for his folks - or putting a bite in their collective mouths.
"We only want what is good for our fans" isn't cutting it anymore.
By listening and reading what they, as representatives of the NFL, are allegedy saying, according to the ASS, it appears they are not only demeaning DeMaurice Smith and his team, but, their NFL fan base as well.
And, that's a !@#$%^ shame - whether it's prime time "chutzpa" - or not.
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
PASS ME NOT?
There is a beautiful Negro Spiritual by the name of,"Pass Me Not."
It is beautiful because it beseechs as follows: (first verse)
'Pass me not, O gentle Savior
Hear my humble cry
While on others Thou art calling
Do not pass me by"
Despite using the hymn as a rare analogy in this blog, I wish to emphasize there is no intent to deface the beautiful message. I listened to the hymn yesterday - with tears in my eyes. And,
that was a jazz version; albeit with two gospel choirs included.
Today, before returning to that amazing version of the hymn, I wandered over to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette sports pages seeking an update on the NFL negotiations with the NFLPA.
By reading the entire article, I fed into one of my pet peeves
That would be any action that encourages the published words , "will be unidentified as they spoke on the condition of anonymity because . . . . . . . . . . not authorized, etc. etc.."
In some ways I wish I had not continued reading the article, as that phrase was contained in the second paragraph. I should have known that to read further was not going to be positive.
I was right. What I read only increased my disgust with what is going on in Pro Football.
To refresh: The NFL Players Assoc. has successfully sued the NFL over a side agreement they had reached with the networks. It would have awarded the owners a $4 Billion "(that's with a 'B') "war chest" - in the event they locked out the workers and no football was to be played.
It is beautiful because it beseechs as follows: (first verse)
'Pass me not, O gentle Savior
Hear my humble cry
While on others Thou art calling
Do not pass me by"
Despite using the hymn as a rare analogy in this blog, I wish to emphasize there is no intent to deface the beautiful message. I listened to the hymn yesterday - with tears in my eyes. And,
that was a jazz version; albeit with two gospel choirs included.
Today, before returning to that amazing version of the hymn, I wandered over to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette sports pages seeking an update on the NFL negotiations with the NFLPA.
By reading the entire article, I fed into one of my pet peeves
That would be any action that encourages the published words , "will be unidentified as they spoke on the condition of anonymity because . . . . . . . . . . not authorized, etc. etc.."
In some ways I wish I had not continued reading the article, as that phrase was contained in the second paragraph. I should have known that to read further was not going to be positive.
I was right. What I read only increased my disgust with what is going on in Pro Football.
To refresh: The NFL Players Assoc. has successfully sued the NFL over a side agreement they had reached with the networks. It would have awarded the owners a $4 Billion "(that's with a 'B') "war chest" - in the event they locked out the workers and no football was to be played.
The ruling judge, U.S District Judge David Doty, who heard the dispute said, "I - Don't- Think - So!"
Doty states, "The record shows that the NFL undertook contract renegotiations to advance it's own interests and harm the interests of the players."
He also cited "an NFL Decision Tree" as a "glaring example" of the leagues intent.
Included in the article I researched was a quote from an "unidentified (there's that word again) network executive on TV rights talks with the NFL: "You know you've reached the absolute limits of your power as a major network . . . (when) the Commisioner of the NFL calls you . . . . and says... 'we're done, pay this or move on."
League spokesman Greg Aiello, upon hearing Judge Doty's ruling, downplayed it's significance by saying the 32 owners are "prepared for any contingency."
The league currently receives the first $1.3 Billion off the top of the current $9 Billion for expenses, and seeks another $1 billion to add to the "off the top" figure.
So, $1 billion is enough to drag your feet in negotiations - but the loss of $4 billion is inconsequential?
Judge Doty is the judge who has overseen NFL labor issues since he presided over the 1993 decision that cleared the way for the current free agency system.
According to the anonymous "leaked negotiation information" is the following:
- there has been some movement on the revenue split issue -negotiated to $750/800 mil.
- the union continues to seek extensive data about team finances. NFL says NO
- sources say the failure to reach compromise on the division of revenues is due to the NFL's insistance it be tied in to the issue of removing the continued oversight of the sports labor situation by Judge Doty. Doty is currently planning to hold a hearing to determine damages and remedies, including an injunction following the $4 Billion fiasco.
What these sources (allegedly) said is, " The owners view the exclusion of Doty from future involvement as a major issue in these negotiations and would be unlikely to agree to any settlement that includes his continued oversight of the collective bargaining agreement."
They also say, "one major tradeoff this week was for the NFL to 'buy off' the future exclusion of such oversight by making a major concession to the players on the revenue split."
So, what is the impetus of the NFL's potential season ending negotiation strategy?
Finances? A longer regular season? increasing concussion injuries? The health care of those ex-players who made it so great - rookie contract limitations? - or, is it just avoiding anti-trust litigation via a potential suit by the players if and when they decertify the union?
Seems like the self-appointed "Lords of Football" have seen some paint from this anti-trust brush a few years ago. They have unsucessfully sought via prior litigation to gain the anti-trust exemption "the boys of summer" have already been awarded.
Count me as saying to these self-appointed "God's" - not, "Pass Me Not" - but, "Pass Me By."
Litigation may be the only way out of this mess. Count me as more than willing to give up Pro Football for a year - or whatever time period is required to end this unconscionable display of what appears to be a complete lack of ethics on the part of the NFL - not- just good negotating strategy as the "spinmeisters" would have you believe.
The power we gave the NFL owners and the league is way out of control - and the potential consequences should not be ignored. Folks, it's costing you money even if you don't have season tickets. Why should your kids not be able to enjoy watching an NFL game in person? You did!
Honest, the kids don't care if they sit in the luxury boxes or not. But, the cost to those of you who are weighing putting food on the table vs giving your kids the NFL experience, is something to which these 32 owners will never be able to relate.
Until someone, whether it be the players union - a U.S. District Judge - our Congress (unlikely due to lobbist contributions)- or the High Court - makes the owners take a look at themselves in the mirror - and shows them what a blindside hit really is - the rich will continue to get richer.
And we will all be the poorer for it........
- "better to be poor - than a liar." (Proverbs 19:22)
Count me on the side of friend Harry in his excellent discourse on unions. http://harry2335.blogspot.com/
Friday, March 4, 2011
A HARD DECISION (F) #
When you live in a senior community you take a real interest in medical breakthrough news.
The other day, last Wednesday - to be specific - we seniors picked up on the news about non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). Some, like me, got the news early, as my USA Today is delivered to the door.
Other male seniors, whose wives arise earlier than they do, discovered their USA today delivery service was apparently once again experiencing some real problems. There may have been another reason.
To help your understanding of theNSAIDS situation, please note that they include: Ibuprofen Advil, Aleve, Anacin, Alka Seltzer, aspirin, Excedrin, & Bufferin
It's been unseasonably cold in florida..
There are only so many things many of the guys can do at that time. Florida winter can cause shuffle board courts to start to ice over and normal early tee times to have to be pushed back, assuming there's availability.
Seniors are a hearty group, but if we slip on ice & fall on our keisters it hurts a little more than when it happens to baby-boomers. The discoloration and healing process sticks around a lot longer too.
So, when there are certain limitations to outdoor activity; alternative choices are necessary.
Some of the guys jump in the car and go up the road to the Casino. Failing to do so can cause more than a few to be cold cocked with hidden 'honeydoo' lists.
A few men watch hunting & fishing reruns. Some of us use the time to catch up on our reading, and/or write more "blogs". Some guys even accompanied their wife to the grocery store.
I'm more a member of the reader group - and on Wednesday around noon I found there are many more male readers down here than I could have possibly imagined.
I was shopping down at Publix alone at that time. What struck me was the great increase in loud voices, animated conversations, and general excitement in the store.
Some of gthe noise came from guys whose newpaper didn't arrive but who found copies on the rack at Publix. As they skimmed through the headlines - and read further - the clamor grew.
Guys were actually interupting their wive's as they were checking off items on their shopping lists. A real non-no in my book.
They were desperate to tell the wives about what they read . When they finished their tale there appeared to be a resounding male chorus of : "See, I told you it wasn't me!"
Alas, their excitement was quickly dampened. The information seemed to have fallen on deaf ears. Many of the wives clearly did not share their enthusiasm. They also didn't appear to be surprised by the news.
One guy, Petey Proudhomme, from over in Tara, was actually bending his wife over the frozen food bins as he fought to make his point. Alberta, his wife, in an excellent defensive move, pushed him into the rack of Heinz Catsup bottles, stacked pyramid style. That got the manager's attention.
Dusty Rhodes wife Velma yelled, "What do you want - you old foop?" (apparently a Michigan term.). Dusty, not to be outdone, shouted back , "I want your attention - the paper says there's been a breakthrough on E.D.S.!." She didn't appear to care.
Vinnie d'Angelo's spouse, Carmen , shrugged when she got the news. She also refused to feign any semblance of interest in Vinnie's excitement and instead asked, "Where in the name of God do you think they have hidden the grated parmesan cheese this time?"
Vinnie, her 7 handicap hubby came right back, as he was better at golf than repartee. He didn't pick up on Carm's superb command of the art of deflection and persisted, "Carm, I'm telling you there'sgood news about erectile dysfunction."(EDS)
Carmen's apparent lack of interest did not abate. She was sure there couldn't possibly be any bad news having to do with EDS. The last, and only, time this topic caught her eye, as well as her reflexes, was a few years ago - and she hadn't changed her mind since.
It was at that time that Vinnie had bought home his first purchase of Viagra - immediately after his annual chat with their family internist and then, the local pharmacist - both men, I should add.
Despite his excitement back then, the news had awakened what carmen was sure were her worst fears. But, the "worst" was actually still to come.
When Vinnie shared that Amin, the Pharmacist, informed him one pill could last 8 hours she fainted dead away, failing to grab the kitchen counter for support on her way down, and pulling her homemade pasta on top of her.
Now, Carm thought, "The old fool is back at it again." Quickly recovering, she tried to figure out where she hid that "stupid" Viagra the last time the subject had arisen.
The newspaper article Vinnie was waving in her face now disclosed that a medical study had found the regular use of NSAIDS could cause a 22% increase in the possibility a guy might no longer have to feel he was not 'The Man Of The House".
Well, while it made for good conversation for the guys in the Golf & Shuttleboard leagues when the weather warmed up that day, it is reported this medical breakthrough didn't seem to have excited too many of the womanfolk - at least in a positive manner.
What made it worse is the male excitement diminished even more the following day.
That's when USA Today disclosed another portion of the study: the frequent use of Ibuprofen -while harmful to man's lifelong fascination and favorite extra curricular habit- could cut their possibility of suffering from Parkinson's Disease by 38%.
Now that did get "Mother's" attention; and she was the one to share the news with her spouse.
The temperature has risen in the Senior communities - but that's about all down here.
One footnote: I couldn't sleep on recyling night; so I went for a walk.
During my long stroll I counted 27 wives pulling Wednesday's timely delivered edition of USA Today from some really creative locations under their night garments and burying them deep into the bottom of the paper bag in the recycling bin.
# ( F = Fiction)
The other day, last Wednesday - to be specific - we seniors picked up on the news about non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). Some, like me, got the news early, as my USA Today is delivered to the door.
Other male seniors, whose wives arise earlier than they do, discovered their USA today delivery service was apparently once again experiencing some real problems. There may have been another reason.
To help your understanding of theNSAIDS situation, please note that they include: Ibuprofen Advil, Aleve, Anacin, Alka Seltzer, aspirin, Excedrin, & Bufferin
It's been unseasonably cold in florida..
There are only so many things many of the guys can do at that time. Florida winter can cause shuffle board courts to start to ice over and normal early tee times to have to be pushed back, assuming there's availability.
Seniors are a hearty group, but if we slip on ice & fall on our keisters it hurts a little more than when it happens to baby-boomers. The discoloration and healing process sticks around a lot longer too.
So, when there are certain limitations to outdoor activity; alternative choices are necessary.
Some of the guys jump in the car and go up the road to the Casino. Failing to do so can cause more than a few to be cold cocked with hidden 'honeydoo' lists.
A few men watch hunting & fishing reruns. Some of us use the time to catch up on our reading, and/or write more "blogs". Some guys even accompanied their wife to the grocery store.
I'm more a member of the reader group - and on Wednesday around noon I found there are many more male readers down here than I could have possibly imagined.
I was shopping down at Publix alone at that time. What struck me was the great increase in loud voices, animated conversations, and general excitement in the store.
Some of gthe noise came from guys whose newpaper didn't arrive but who found copies on the rack at Publix. As they skimmed through the headlines - and read further - the clamor grew.
Guys were actually interupting their wive's as they were checking off items on their shopping lists. A real non-no in my book.
They were desperate to tell the wives about what they read . When they finished their tale there appeared to be a resounding male chorus of : "See, I told you it wasn't me!"
Alas, their excitement was quickly dampened. The information seemed to have fallen on deaf ears. Many of the wives clearly did not share their enthusiasm. They also didn't appear to be surprised by the news.
One guy, Petey Proudhomme, from over in Tara, was actually bending his wife over the frozen food bins as he fought to make his point. Alberta, his wife, in an excellent defensive move, pushed him into the rack of Heinz Catsup bottles, stacked pyramid style. That got the manager's attention.
Dusty Rhodes wife Velma yelled, "What do you want - you old foop?" (apparently a Michigan term.). Dusty, not to be outdone, shouted back , "I want your attention - the paper says there's been a breakthrough on E.D.S.!." She didn't appear to care.
Vinnie d'Angelo's spouse, Carmen , shrugged when she got the news. She also refused to feign any semblance of interest in Vinnie's excitement and instead asked, "Where in the name of God do you think they have hidden the grated parmesan cheese this time?"
Vinnie, her 7 handicap hubby came right back, as he was better at golf than repartee. He didn't pick up on Carm's superb command of the art of deflection and persisted, "Carm, I'm telling you there'sgood news about erectile dysfunction."(EDS)
Carmen's apparent lack of interest did not abate. She was sure there couldn't possibly be any bad news having to do with EDS. The last, and only, time this topic caught her eye, as well as her reflexes, was a few years ago - and she hadn't changed her mind since.
It was at that time that Vinnie had bought home his first purchase of Viagra - immediately after his annual chat with their family internist and then, the local pharmacist - both men, I should add.
Despite his excitement back then, the news had awakened what carmen was sure were her worst fears. But, the "worst" was actually still to come.
When Vinnie shared that Amin, the Pharmacist, informed him one pill could last 8 hours she fainted dead away, failing to grab the kitchen counter for support on her way down, and pulling her homemade pasta on top of her.
Now, Carm thought, "The old fool is back at it again." Quickly recovering, she tried to figure out where she hid that "stupid" Viagra the last time the subject had arisen.
The newspaper article Vinnie was waving in her face now disclosed that a medical study had found the regular use of NSAIDS could cause a 22% increase in the possibility a guy might no longer have to feel he was not 'The Man Of The House".
Well, while it made for good conversation for the guys in the Golf & Shuttleboard leagues when the weather warmed up that day, it is reported this medical breakthrough didn't seem to have excited too many of the womanfolk - at least in a positive manner.
What made it worse is the male excitement diminished even more the following day.
That's when USA Today disclosed another portion of the study: the frequent use of Ibuprofen -while harmful to man's lifelong fascination and favorite extra curricular habit- could cut their possibility of suffering from Parkinson's Disease by 38%.
Now that did get "Mother's" attention; and she was the one to share the news with her spouse.
The temperature has risen in the Senior communities - but that's about all down here.
One footnote: I couldn't sleep on recyling night; so I went for a walk.
During my long stroll I counted 27 wives pulling Wednesday's timely delivered edition of USA Today from some really creative locations under their night garments and burying them deep into the bottom of the paper bag in the recycling bin.
# ( F = Fiction)
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
A SEARCH FOR SANITY
The other day actor, Charlie Sheen, proclaimed himself to be comparable to God.
Also, yet to be drafted Auburn football star Cam Newton, decided he was already an icon.
One assumes you gain that status when, as a Florida student, you throw stolen computers out a dorm window to avoid being arrested; and your old man is later shopping you around at $200,000.
My beautiful granddaughter Shannon's favorite teen star, Justin Bieber has recently changed his hairstyle and written an autobiography. Sorry Shannon, I know I'm a mean old man, but to write that book I assume he must have a memory that goes back to the time he spent in the nursery.
By the way I agree, that haircut makes him look almost 14! (just kidding)
Movie star Leslie Lohan has been accused of shoplifting and may finally do more than passive jail time despite what her attorneys tell us. The judge was so outraged he is recusing himself.
Paris Hilton was arrested with drugs. My wife Phyllis and I have forgiven her as her recipe for Spinach Lasagna, which we tried the other night, was a great hit. Phyl has added almost a quarter inch to each bicep.
Two acclaimed movie directors, The Farrelly Brothers have recently released a movie called "Hall Pass" which features projectile diarrhea , and jokes about masturbation and oral sex. It got an "R" rating for crude and sexual humor, language, some graphic nudity, and drug use.
It's not just our entertainment heros who sometimes mystify us here. A guy who is like a mayor in Nogales, a Mexican city bordering Fort Worth, where drug lords are fighting each other and killed 3,000 people in the process is protesting unfavorable press coverage of the city.
I guess he thinks it will be bad for the tourist trade.
Back to actor Charlie's case, his self-elevated status is accompanied by more bizarre behavior than the others referenced.. His adult film star acquaintance relates an incident where he is smoking cocaine from tennis ball sized lumps. One assumes the lumps weren't huge as he needs to fit them into the briefcase of heroin he supposedly carries around with him.
Then again, maybe it's a suitcase. Question: In this nutty TV world why doesn't Lenny Briscoe just crossover, arrest him and confiscate the H?
Charlie who is in self-imposed rehabilitative time-out at home has been doing interviews with the various networks. During these interviews he makes comments about CBS, the creative inventor of his show "Two and A Half Men", and the CBS chief, Leslie Moonves.
Charlie has decided CBS owes him a lot after cancelling his show due to his comments, behavior, absences, etc. He states, "Warner Bros. and CBS owe me a big apology - while licking my feet."
USA Today has, via a recent article, set up sort of a dueling banjos debate between psychologists and a psychiatrist. The subject is whether Charlie is suffering from the long term results of substance abuse or is simply bi-polar. Wouldn't a better debate be over why he's not in jail?
Regardless, prior to the recent decision by CBS, Charlie was collecting about 2 million an episode, supposedly in one of his other briefcases. That could give you a big head too.
Now, I admit to liking the show. Apparently I have withdrawn from my admiration for listening to Sinatra sing "Anything Goes" as he makes reference for a need to use words other than those containing just 4 letters.
It would seem my addled brain has chosen to substitute a taste for Cole Porter for the potty humor and constant reference to masturbation in 2 1/2 by the second lead, and excellent actor, Jon Cryer.
Perhaps my change in taste stems from youthful brain scarring over all that censoring recently deceased actress Jane Russell had to go through in the 40's for wanting to show a little cleavage in Howard Hughes movie "The Outlaw."
I couldn't wait to see it but, then again, I've always been a huge Jack Buetel fan.
Do you think I'm bi-polar?
The next thing you know I'll be rooting for Rush Limbaugh to get rid of the slice on the Golf Channel show in which he currently co-stars.
The recurring questions are, "What has happened to us?" " Will we ever recover?"
Just when I was about to forsake all others, it appears that finally, my search for sanity has ended.
From San Francisco: "Consumers have filed lawsuits against more than a dozen national retail chains from operating in California since the State Supreme Court ruled it is illegal for clerks to ask customers for their ZIP codes."
I refused to give this terribly personal information out the other day down at a naational Home Improvement store .The clerk threatened me with being locked in a dark room and having to watch "Hall Pass" for twenty-four hours straight.
Trust me. I beat a hasty retreat out the door and drove to a different ZIP code in case she followed me. No insanity here.
Also, yet to be drafted Auburn football star Cam Newton, decided he was already an icon.
One assumes you gain that status when, as a Florida student, you throw stolen computers out a dorm window to avoid being arrested; and your old man is later shopping you around at $200,000.
My beautiful granddaughter Shannon's favorite teen star, Justin Bieber has recently changed his hairstyle and written an autobiography. Sorry Shannon, I know I'm a mean old man, but to write that book I assume he must have a memory that goes back to the time he spent in the nursery.
By the way I agree, that haircut makes him look almost 14! (just kidding)
Movie star Leslie Lohan has been accused of shoplifting and may finally do more than passive jail time despite what her attorneys tell us. The judge was so outraged he is recusing himself.
Paris Hilton was arrested with drugs. My wife Phyllis and I have forgiven her as her recipe for Spinach Lasagna, which we tried the other night, was a great hit. Phyl has added almost a quarter inch to each bicep.
Two acclaimed movie directors, The Farrelly Brothers have recently released a movie called "Hall Pass" which features projectile diarrhea , and jokes about masturbation and oral sex. It got an "R" rating for crude and sexual humor, language, some graphic nudity, and drug use.
It's not just our entertainment heros who sometimes mystify us here. A guy who is like a mayor in Nogales, a Mexican city bordering Fort Worth, where drug lords are fighting each other and killed 3,000 people in the process is protesting unfavorable press coverage of the city.
I guess he thinks it will be bad for the tourist trade.
Back to actor Charlie's case, his self-elevated status is accompanied by more bizarre behavior than the others referenced.. His adult film star acquaintance relates an incident where he is smoking cocaine from tennis ball sized lumps. One assumes the lumps weren't huge as he needs to fit them into the briefcase of heroin he supposedly carries around with him.
Then again, maybe it's a suitcase. Question: In this nutty TV world why doesn't Lenny Briscoe just crossover, arrest him and confiscate the H?
Charlie who is in self-imposed rehabilitative time-out at home has been doing interviews with the various networks. During these interviews he makes comments about CBS, the creative inventor of his show "Two and A Half Men", and the CBS chief, Leslie Moonves.
Charlie has decided CBS owes him a lot after cancelling his show due to his comments, behavior, absences, etc. He states, "Warner Bros. and CBS owe me a big apology - while licking my feet."
USA Today has, via a recent article, set up sort of a dueling banjos debate between psychologists and a psychiatrist. The subject is whether Charlie is suffering from the long term results of substance abuse or is simply bi-polar. Wouldn't a better debate be over why he's not in jail?
Regardless, prior to the recent decision by CBS, Charlie was collecting about 2 million an episode, supposedly in one of his other briefcases. That could give you a big head too.
Now, I admit to liking the show. Apparently I have withdrawn from my admiration for listening to Sinatra sing "Anything Goes" as he makes reference for a need to use words other than those containing just 4 letters.
It would seem my addled brain has chosen to substitute a taste for Cole Porter for the potty humor and constant reference to masturbation in 2 1/2 by the second lead, and excellent actor, Jon Cryer.
Perhaps my change in taste stems from youthful brain scarring over all that censoring recently deceased actress Jane Russell had to go through in the 40's for wanting to show a little cleavage in Howard Hughes movie "The Outlaw."
I couldn't wait to see it but, then again, I've always been a huge Jack Buetel fan.
Do you think I'm bi-polar?
The next thing you know I'll be rooting for Rush Limbaugh to get rid of the slice on the Golf Channel show in which he currently co-stars.
The recurring questions are, "What has happened to us?" " Will we ever recover?"
Just when I was about to forsake all others, it appears that finally, my search for sanity has ended.
From San Francisco: "Consumers have filed lawsuits against more than a dozen national retail chains from operating in California since the State Supreme Court ruled it is illegal for clerks to ask customers for their ZIP codes."
I refused to give this terribly personal information out the other day down at a naational Home Improvement store .The clerk threatened me with being locked in a dark room and having to watch "Hall Pass" for twenty-four hours straight.
Trust me. I beat a hasty retreat out the door and drove to a different ZIP code in case she followed me. No insanity here.
WATCHFUL WAITING
You know the stupid things you remember from school?
I do and recently confirmed my memory of the original source of the term "watchful waiting" - now more likely to be associated with illness and medicine.
My recall was correct today. It was a phrase and diplomatic philosophy voiced by former U.S. President Woodrow Wilson.
This policy reflected the absence of diplomatic training that Wilson possessed - which may or may not have prompted him to step down as President of Bryn Mawr, "an all girl" school, as we used to say before this age of political correctness.
The Republication administration that immediately preceded him in office was rumored to have complicitly recognized the Mexican regime of General Victoriano Huerta.
Huerta overthrew the Mexican reformer Francisco Madero who attempted to implement control of Mexican resources and utilities; many of which were previously under the control of American business interests. You got to admit the Republicans are pretty consistent.
Wilson did not recognize Huerta and postured his diplomatic position as one of "watchful waiting."
That all went to hell following his aggressive decision to raid Santa Cruz after the Tampico incident between U.S sailors and Mexican officials. Mexico's loss of 300 people resulting from the fray caused them to sever diplomatic relations with us. Only the intervention via mediation of Chile, Brazil, and Argentina got everybody settled down.
Now, what the heck does that have to do with anything, you probably are asking yourself?
Well, occasionally friend Harry and I trade references to each other in our respective blogs.
Sometimes those references address the fact that Harry, with his beloved Yankees - and yours truly, with my Pirates have followed our respective teams - it seems like forever. He did so
again recently reminding me he rooted for our Pirates last year. He then followed that with an excellent appraisal of the Yankees through the years at hepie2335@blogspot.com.
Living in Bradenton year round it is not unusual to occasionally glimpse our Pirate players, coaches or management around and about in public gathering places.
Last week my wife and I plus Bella were enjoying the restaurant patio of a local Pizza facility when I observed Pirates President Frank Coonelly enter the restaurant and sit at the counter.
Like Chuck Tanner, I had met Frank via my brother Jim. Otherwise, I might have not known him from any other ruggedly good looking Irishman in great shape. (hopefully, that's not an oxymoron.)
Immediately, the guy on the stool beside him engaged Frank in conversation. I assumed it was because the stool neighbor recognized him. It later turned out that was not true. After the Prez finished his beer and obtained his takeout he made a beeline for the door and finished his sprint to his car in less than 4 seconds.
I went in to pay the bill and was kidding the stool guy that whatever he said to Coonelly must have really hit home. He demurred and said, "Did you know who that guy was? He's a really nice guy and is with the Pirates."
So, once more I was wrong about something connected with the Pirates.
Another guy was sitting beside me down at a popular restaurant the other evening and started talking to me right away about the Pirates, despite a lack of clothing suggesting I was a fan. His topic was the wave of enthusiasm that seems to be taking place at Pirate City and McKechnie Field.
I therefore assumed he was part of their management team soliciting public opinions and had picked up on some of my Pittsburgese or dialect.
I had just arrived and lacked my usual sarcastic irish wit. Therefore, I just listened and only slipped once when I offered, "when you lose for 18 years straight - and most recently 105 games-I guess it makes sense to grasp at anything positive".
Per my new BFF, the Pirates players who seem to engender the most positive responses are mostly those youngsters whom we have acquired via our incredibly good drafting position: our reward for playing even more miserably the past few years. We could also add a few more such as Tabata and Snyder whom we have acquired otherwise.
The law of averages involving drafting high, giving away your non-productive veteran ballplayers, and possibly bringing rookies up prematurely because of need, does suggest a better outlook may be justified.
I believe I share my own "watchful waiting" philosophy with several other longtime Pirate fans.
I do so while occasionally adorning myself with my long sleeved No. 8 Pirate jersey in honor of "The Chicken On The Hill" guy, who did admirably represent our "We Are Family" enthusiasm, "back in the day".
It's just that I fervently hope now we conservative Pirate fans won't change our minds, give up on our Woodrew Wilson strategy, and decide to attack Vera Cruz.
Might be some good ballplayers there.
I do and recently confirmed my memory of the original source of the term "watchful waiting" - now more likely to be associated with illness and medicine.
My recall was correct today. It was a phrase and diplomatic philosophy voiced by former U.S. President Woodrow Wilson.
This policy reflected the absence of diplomatic training that Wilson possessed - which may or may not have prompted him to step down as President of Bryn Mawr, "an all girl" school, as we used to say before this age of political correctness.
The Republication administration that immediately preceded him in office was rumored to have complicitly recognized the Mexican regime of General Victoriano Huerta.
Huerta overthrew the Mexican reformer Francisco Madero who attempted to implement control of Mexican resources and utilities; many of which were previously under the control of American business interests. You got to admit the Republicans are pretty consistent.
Wilson did not recognize Huerta and postured his diplomatic position as one of "watchful waiting."
That all went to hell following his aggressive decision to raid Santa Cruz after the Tampico incident between U.S sailors and Mexican officials. Mexico's loss of 300 people resulting from the fray caused them to sever diplomatic relations with us. Only the intervention via mediation of Chile, Brazil, and Argentina got everybody settled down.
Now, what the heck does that have to do with anything, you probably are asking yourself?
Well, occasionally friend Harry and I trade references to each other in our respective blogs.
Sometimes those references address the fact that Harry, with his beloved Yankees - and yours truly, with my Pirates have followed our respective teams - it seems like forever. He did so
again recently reminding me he rooted for our Pirates last year. He then followed that with an excellent appraisal of the Yankees through the years at hepie2335@blogspot.com.
Living in Bradenton year round it is not unusual to occasionally glimpse our Pirate players, coaches or management around and about in public gathering places.
Last week my wife and I plus Bella were enjoying the restaurant patio of a local Pizza facility when I observed Pirates President Frank Coonelly enter the restaurant and sit at the counter.
Like Chuck Tanner, I had met Frank via my brother Jim. Otherwise, I might have not known him from any other ruggedly good looking Irishman in great shape. (hopefully, that's not an oxymoron.)
Immediately, the guy on the stool beside him engaged Frank in conversation. I assumed it was because the stool neighbor recognized him. It later turned out that was not true. After the Prez finished his beer and obtained his takeout he made a beeline for the door and finished his sprint to his car in less than 4 seconds.
I went in to pay the bill and was kidding the stool guy that whatever he said to Coonelly must have really hit home. He demurred and said, "Did you know who that guy was? He's a really nice guy and is with the Pirates."
So, once more I was wrong about something connected with the Pirates.
Another guy was sitting beside me down at a popular restaurant the other evening and started talking to me right away about the Pirates, despite a lack of clothing suggesting I was a fan. His topic was the wave of enthusiasm that seems to be taking place at Pirate City and McKechnie Field.
I therefore assumed he was part of their management team soliciting public opinions and had picked up on some of my Pittsburgese or dialect.
I had just arrived and lacked my usual sarcastic irish wit. Therefore, I just listened and only slipped once when I offered, "when you lose for 18 years straight - and most recently 105 games-I guess it makes sense to grasp at anything positive".
Per my new BFF, the Pirates players who seem to engender the most positive responses are mostly those youngsters whom we have acquired via our incredibly good drafting position: our reward for playing even more miserably the past few years. We could also add a few more such as Tabata and Snyder whom we have acquired otherwise.
The law of averages involving drafting high, giving away your non-productive veteran ballplayers, and possibly bringing rookies up prematurely because of need, does suggest a better outlook may be justified.
I believe I share my own "watchful waiting" philosophy with several other longtime Pirate fans.
I do so while occasionally adorning myself with my long sleeved No. 8 Pirate jersey in honor of "The Chicken On The Hill" guy, who did admirably represent our "We Are Family" enthusiasm, "back in the day".
It's just that I fervently hope now we conservative Pirate fans won't change our minds, give up on our Woodrew Wilson strategy, and decide to attack Vera Cruz.
Might be some good ballplayers there.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)